or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Thomas 'Tim' Timothy Holden

Thomas 'Tim' Timothy Holden's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: Thomas 'Tim' Timothy Holden

Foreign Affairs

2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 4%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 8%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 67%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 47%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 67%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 52%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 42%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 25%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 67%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 44%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 38%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 78%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 13%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 64%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 17%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 25%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 25%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 25%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 60%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 50%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -7%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 0%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 42%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 31%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 25%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues D-
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 70%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score F
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A-
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 67%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 62%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 44%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement B
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 57%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 64%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 30%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 50%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 27%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 83%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 14%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 38%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 50%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 50%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 25%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 59%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 41%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -9
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C+
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 65%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 34%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 50%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 69%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 43%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 53%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 67%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 40%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 75%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -10
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 70%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 53%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 55%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 33%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 39%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 44%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 32%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 25%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 46%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 20%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 71%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -6
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 22%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 21%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 33%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 43%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 0%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 45%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 20%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 14%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 77%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 40%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 27%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 64%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 52%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 61%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 37%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 50%
1997-1998 PeacePAC - Positions 50%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 60%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 25%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 50%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 54%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 45%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 20%
1996 PeacePAC - Positions 40%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 40%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top