or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Thomas 'Tim' Timothy Holden

Thomas 'Tim' Timothy Holden's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Defense

Full Name: Thomas 'Tim' Timothy Holden

Defense

2011-2012 Center for Security Policy - Positions 41%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 67%
2009-2010 Center for Security Policy - Positions 62%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 50%
2007-2008 Center for Security Policy - Positions 46%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 62%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 57%
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 83%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Center for Security Policy - Positions 63%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 69%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 55%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 63%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 59%
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 22%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 53%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 14%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 40%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 64%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 61%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 37%
1997-1998 PeacePAC - Positions 50%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 60%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 50%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 54%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 45%
1996 PeacePAC - Positions 40%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top