Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Peter 'Pete' T. King's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (NY) - District 2, Republican

Taxes

2013-2014 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 67%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 43%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 54%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 40%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 25%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 63%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 62%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 65%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 48%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 78%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 89%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 77%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 76%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 47%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 61%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 54%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 64%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 67%
2008 Americans for Fair Taxation - Positions on the FairTax 0
2008 FreedomWorks - Positions 44%
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score C-
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 36%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 67%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 47%
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score C-
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 64%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 46%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 2%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 67%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 49%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 44%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 0%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 63%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 83%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 59%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 52%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 79%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 17%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 48%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 46%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 48%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 45%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 70%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 70%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 59%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 70
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 70
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 70
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 53%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 73
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 73
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 73
2001-2002 FreedomWorks - Positions 75%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 89%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 59%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 65%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 77.5%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 45%
1999-2000 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 58%
1999 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 64%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 80%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 52%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 52%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1997-1998 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 71%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 36%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 94%
1995-1996 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 98%
1995 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 82%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Taxes Score 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top