Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Robert 'Bob' Menendez's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Agriculture and Food

Office: U.S. Senate (NJ) - Sr, Democratic

Agriculture and Food

2014 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 83%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 80%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 94%
2011 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 80%
2009-2010 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 50%
2009-2010 National Farmers Union - Positions 100%
2008 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 80%
2007-2008 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 64%
2007-2008 Grassroots Netroots Alliance - Positions 80%
2007-2008 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 83
2007 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 79%
2007 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 35%
2006 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 62%
2005-2006 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 17%
2005-2006 National Farmers Union - Positions 100%
2005 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 28%
2005 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 33%
2003-2004 National Farmers Union - Positions 60%
2002 Vote Hemp - Positions on Industrial Hemp Policy Fence Sitter
2001-2002 Minnesota Farm Bureau - Positions 14%
2001-2002 Minnesota Farm Bureau - Positions 19%
2001-2002 National Farmers Union - Positions 80%
2001 American Coalition for Ethanol - Positions 100%
2000 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 33%
1999-2000 National Farmers Union - Positions 92%
1998 National Farmers Union - Positions 88%
1997 National Farmers Union - Positions 86%
1996 National Farmers Union - Positions 64%
1995-1996 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 31%
1995 National Farmers Union - Positions 90%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Positions on Agriculture 0%
1994 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 89%
1993-1994 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 21%
1993 National Farmers Union - Positions 89%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top