Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Frank J. Pallone, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (NJ) - District 6, Democratic

Taxes

2013-2014 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 30%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 9%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 26%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 15%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 15%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 8%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 16%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 11%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 5%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 2%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 0%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 1%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 23%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 0%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2008 Americans for Fair Taxation - Positions on the FairTax 0
2008 FreedomWorks - Positions 0%
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score F
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 6%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 0%
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 5%
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score F
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 0%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 41%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 0%
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 8%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 16%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 8%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 3%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 8%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 6%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 14%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 5%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 55%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 30%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 10%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 8%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 15%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 18%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 5%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 22%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 5
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 5
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 5
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 10%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 29%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2001-2002 FreedomWorks - Positions 10%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 11%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 10%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 13%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 18%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 13%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 22%
1999-2000 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 25%
1999 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 9%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 28%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 24%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 15%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 21%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 10%
1997-1998 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 11%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 34%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 22%
1995-1996 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 20%
1995 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 42%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Taxes Score 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top