Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Dale E. Kildee's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 100%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 47%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Total Score 95%
2012 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil Rights 100%
2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 84%
2011-2012 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 80%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56%
2011 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 84%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 81%
2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 91%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 60%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 38%
2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 98%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 14%
2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 96%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 90
2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 91%
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 80%
2007-2008 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil and Human 96
2007-2008 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions on Civil Rights and Social Justice Issues 100%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 88%
2007-2008 The Arc - Positions 57%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 100
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 100
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 87%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 100%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100%
2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100
2007 PFLAG, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays - Positions 100%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur A
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 14%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80%
2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur A
2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 86%
2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 75%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 94%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 73%
2005-2006 The Arc - Positions 100%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80%
2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 100%
2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 96%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 66%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 86%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 100%
2004 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 65%
2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 66%
2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 90%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 100%
2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 90%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 0
2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 53%
2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 83%
2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 89%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 59%
2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 55%
2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 91%
2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 86%
2000 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 57%
2000 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 100%
2000 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 93%
1999-2000 Common Cause - Lifetime Score 0%
1999-2000 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
1999-2000 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
1999 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 62%
1999 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 91%
1999 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 91%
1998 National Organization for Women - Positions 55%
1997-1998 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 50%
1997-1998 Campaign for a Color Blind America - Positions 0%
1997-1998 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 20%
1997-1998 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 88%
1997-1998 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 92%
1997-1998 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 88%
1997 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 17%
1996 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 50%
1995-1996 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 78%
1995-1996 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 85%
1995-1996 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 73%
1991-1992 National Gay & Lesbian Task Force - Positions 85%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top