or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Frederick 'Fred' Stephen Upton

Frederick 'Fred' Stephen Upton's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

Full Name: Frederick 'Fred' Stephen Upton
Current Office: U.S. House - District 6, Republican
First Elected: 11/04/1986
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 6
Primary Aug. 5, 2014

Women

2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2013 Federally Employed Women - Positions 20%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2012 Federally Employed Women - Positions 30%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 American Association of University Women - Positions 0
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions (House Only) 0%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 33%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 5%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 46
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 9%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2009 American Association of University Women - Positions 11%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 25%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 0%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 68%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 40
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 63%
2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 66
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 40%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 50%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 0%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 50%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 30%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 79%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 40%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 14%
2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 33%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 43%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2004 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women - Positions 12%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 46%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 22%
2003 American Association of University Women - Positions 20%
2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 43%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2002 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100%
2001-2002 American Association of University Women - Positions 18%
2001-2002 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 9%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 83%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 18%
2001 American Association of University Women - Positions 14%
2001 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 50%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 25%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 64%
2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 22%
1999-2000 American Association of University Women - Positions 12%
1999 American Association of University Women - Positions 33%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 35%
1998 National Organization for Women - Positions 35%
1997-1998 American Association of University Women - Positions 38%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
1997 American Association of University Women - Positions 20%
1997 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 32%
1996 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 25%
1995-1996 American Association of University Women - Positions 25%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995 The Woman Activist - Positions 40%
1989-1990 National Women's Political Caucus - Positions 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top