or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

[x] close
Print Track This Candidate

John W. Olver

John W. Olver's Special Interest Group Ratings

John W. Olver
Full Name: John W. Olver

Filter by Issue:

Budget, Spending and Taxes

2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 88%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 80%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 8%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 20%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 92%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 16%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 2%
2010 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 6%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 1%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 1%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 7%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 0%
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 5%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 0%
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 0%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 16%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 3%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 12%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 6%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 17%
2005 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 87%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 10%
2004 American Shareholders Association - Positions 20%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 10%
2004 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 50%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 18%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 0%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 23%
2003 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 60%
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 0%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 24%
2002 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 50%
2001-2002 Concord Coalition - Positions 55%
2001-2002 FreedomWorks - Positions 5%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 3%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 0%
2001 American Shareholders Association - Positions 0%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 8%
2001 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 50%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 7.5%
2000 Concord Coalition - Positions 43%
2000 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 54%
1999-2000 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 9%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 10%
1999 Concord Coalition - Positions 68%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 19%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 5%
1998 Concord Coalition - Positions 28%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 16%
1998 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 56%
1997-1998 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 8%
1997 Concord Coalition - Positions 47%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 28%
1997 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 69%
1996 Concord Coalition - Positions 62%
1995-1996 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 7%
1995 Concord Coalition - Positions 41%
1995 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 20%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Deregulation Score 14%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Spending Score 6%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Total Score 7%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Budget Score 3%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Taxes Score 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

About Project Vote Smart

Help Us If You Can

Media & Communications

Education

For Candidates

One Common Ground, Philipsburg, MT 59858 Hotline: 888-Vote-Smart (888-868-3762)
All content © 1992 - 2013 Project Vote Smart unless otherwise attributed - Privacy Policy - Legislative demographic data provided by Aristotle International, Inc. Mobile Version

Back to top