Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Olympia Jean Snowe's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Environment

2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 71%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 65%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 71%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 72%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 68%
2011 Environment America - Positions 81%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 64%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 65%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 65%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 17%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 44%
2009-2010 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 90
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 25%
2009 Environment America - Positions 71%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 73%
2008 Environment America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 76
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 64%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 85%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 79
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 80%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 50%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 86
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 86%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 71%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 55%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 30%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 50%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 70
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 70%
2005 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 11%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 68%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 80%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 54%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 55%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 74%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 60%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 40%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 72%
2001-2002 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 42%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 0%
1999-2000 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 56%
1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 67%
1998 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
1997 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 71%
1995-1996 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 59%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Environment Score 38%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top