Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Olympia Jean Snowe's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Abortion

Abortion

2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 66%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 60%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 45%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 50%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 35%
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 42%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 28%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 95%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 33%
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 57
2007-2008 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 14%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 46%
2005-2006 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 55%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 53%
2003-2004 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 27%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 65%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 83%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 60%
2001-2002 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 90%
1999-2000 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
1999 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
1997-1998 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 27%
1997 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 77%
1997 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 25%
1996 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 91%
1996 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 14%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top