Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Dan L. Burton's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Immigration

Immigration

2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 4%
2012 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Legislation Evaluation (House Only) 19%
2011-2012 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 93%
2011-2012 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Positions 39%
2011-2012 The Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans - Positions 0%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score 0%
2009-2010 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 100%
2009-2010 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Positions 24%
2009-2010 United States English - U.S. House Score 83%
2007-2010 National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions 0%
2007-2008 English First - Positions on English as the Official Language B
2007-2008 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 92%
2007-2008 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Greek American Issues Score 45%
2007-2008 United States English - Positions on English as the Official Language A
2007 English First - Positions 100%
2007 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 100%
2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 0
2006 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2006 English First - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 0%
2005-2006 United States Border Control - Positions 100%
2005 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2005 Americans for Immigration Control - Positions 100%
2005 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 86%
2005 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 66%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 0%
2004 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 93%
2004 National Council of La Raza - Positions 0%
2003-2006 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 84%
2003-2005 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 77%
2003-2004 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 11%
2003-2004 United States Border Control - Positions 80%
2003 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 100%
2002 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 33%
2001-2002 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 6%
2001 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 100%
2001 English First - Positions 100%
2000 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 40%
1999 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 18%
1997-1998 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 13%
1997-1998 United States Border Control - Positions 86%
1997 Americans for Immigration Control - Positions 100%
1996 Americans for Immigration Control - Positions 88%
1996 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 75%
1995-2004 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
1995-1996 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 10%
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Overall - Career (Feb 11, 2013) 91%
1989-2002 Americans for Better Immigration - Lifetime Score 98%
1989-2001 Americans for Better Immigration - Lifetime Score 97%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top