or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Dan L. Burton

Dan L. Burton's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Budget, Spending and Taxes

Full Name: Dan L. Burton

Budget, Spending and Taxes

2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 9%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
2012 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 63%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 82%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 82%
2012 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 0%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2011 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 88%
2011 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 5%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 97%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 85%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 85%
2011 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 11%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 98%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 98%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 94%
2010 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 90%
2010 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 13%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 89%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 98%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 3%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 12%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 10%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 90%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 94%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 88%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 88%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 85%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 96%
2009 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 17
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 9%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 85%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 30%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 12%
2008 Americans for Fair Taxation - Positions on the FairTax 2
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 87%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 78%
2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 30
2008 FreedomWorks - Positions 94%
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score A
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score A
2008 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 18%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 94%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 94%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2007 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 22%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
2007 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 84%
2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 10
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 95%
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score A
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score A
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 86%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 61%
2007 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions on Poverty Action F
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 15%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 78%
2006 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 91%
2006 Church World Service - Positions 33
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 58%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 63%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 63%
2006 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 11%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 67%
2006 The Retired Enlisted Association - Retired Military Benefits Issues Score 7%
2006 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 79%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Economic Issues 48%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 91%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 96%
2005 Church World Service - Positions 25
2005 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 79%
2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 71%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 63%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 63%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 80%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 58%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 37%
2005 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 6%
2005 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 11%
2004 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 13%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
2004 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 72%
2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 65%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 65%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 65%
2004 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2004 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 25%
2004 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 75%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 73%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 92%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 30%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2003 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 81%
2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 50%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 71%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 71%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2003 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 15%
2003 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 40%
2002 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2002 American Benefits Council - Positions 20%
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2002 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 87%
2002 Emergency Committee for American Trade - Positions 50%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 58%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 58%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 93
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 93
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 93
2002 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2002 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Bread for the World - Positions 33%
2001-2002 Concord Coalition - Positions 66%
2001-2002 FreedomWorks - Positions 85%
2001-2002 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 31%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 97%
2001 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2001 American Benefits Council - Positions 100%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2001 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 80%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 81%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 72%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 72%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 82%
2001 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 27%
2001 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 23%
2000 American Benefits Council - Positions 100%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
2000 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
2000 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 75%
2000 Concord Coalition - Positions 31%
2000 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 10%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 74%
2000 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 14%
2000 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 46%
1999-2000 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 36%
1999-2000 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 91%
1999-2000 United Seniors Association - Positions 100%
1999 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 91%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 72%
1999 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
1999 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 84%
1999 Concord Coalition - Positions 26%
1999 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 22%
1999 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 0%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 77%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 61%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 61%
1999 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 35
1999 United Seniors Association - Positions 100%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
1998 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
1998 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 72%
1998 Concord Coalition - Positions 11%
1998 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 11%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 51%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 51%
1998 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 18%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 80%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 80%
1997-1998 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 60%
1997-1998 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 95%
1997 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
1997 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 78%
1997 Concord Coalition - Positions 56%
1997 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 33%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 64%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 64%
1997 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 28%
1996 Bread for the World - Positions on Addressing World Hunger 0%
1996 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 79%
1996 Concord Coalition - Positions 38%
1996 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 10%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1995-1996 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 27%
1995-1996 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 100%
1995 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 80%
1995 Concord Coalition - Positions 50%
1995 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 85%
1995 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 85%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Taxes Score 100%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Spending Score 92%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Budget Score 94%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top