or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Bobby L. Rush

Bobby L. Rush's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: Bobby L. Rush
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Democratic
First Elected: 11/03/1992
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 1
Primary March 18, 2014
General Nov. 4, 2014

Liberal

2013 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy 91%
2013 National Journal - Liberal (Composite) 91%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Social) 85%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 93%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Composite Score) 95%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 87%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 66%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 66%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 77%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 82.8%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 88%
2006 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 78.2%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 100%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2005 Hope for Peace and Justice - Positions 100
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 90%
2005 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 87%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 91%
2003-2004 Democrats for Life of America - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Radical Middle - Positions 20%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 68%
2003 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 85%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 89%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2002 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 87%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90%
2001-2002 Radical Middle - Positions 30%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 75%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 91%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 96%
2000 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 97%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 96%
1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 90%
1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top