Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Neil Abercrombie's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: Governor (HI), Democratic

Animals and Wildlife

2009-2010 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score 100%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 92%
2008 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 66
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 71%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 92%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 92
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 70%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 83
2006 National Animal Interest Alliance Trust - Positions 0%
2006 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 66%
2005-2006 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2005-2006 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 70%
2005-2006 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 70
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 70%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 67%
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 50%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 67%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 67%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 67%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 80%
2004 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2004 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 67
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 67
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 73%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 67%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 67%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 67%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 67%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 80%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 67%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 88%
2003 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 67%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 67%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 89%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 89%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 60%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 89%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 89%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 89%
2001-2002 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 89%
2001-2002 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 89%
2000 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 50%
2000 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 50
1999-2000 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 50%
1999 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 50%
1997 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 100%
1995-1996 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100%
1995 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 75%
1993-1994 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top