Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Nathan Deal's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: Governor (GA), Republican

Animals and Wildlife

2009-2010 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 0%
2009-2010 Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score 0%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 15%
2008 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 0%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 33
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 6%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 17%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 17
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 10%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 34
2006 National Animal Interest Alliance Trust - Positions 100%
2006 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 0%
2005-2006 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2005-2006 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 42
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 42%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 17%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 22%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 22%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 22%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2004 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2004 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 22
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 22
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 22%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 22%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 22%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 22%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 22%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 0%
2003 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 22%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 22%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 25%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 25%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 25%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 25%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 25%
2001-2002 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 25%
2001-2002 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 25%
2000 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 33%
2000 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 50
1999-2000 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 50%
1999 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 33%
1997 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 50%
1995-1996 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 25%
1995 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 0%
1993-1994 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 21%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top