Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Charles 'Bill' William Young's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 78%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 83%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 78%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 83%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 59%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 71%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 87%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 63%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 59%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 60%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 40
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 88%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 76%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 54%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 52%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 55%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 65%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 76%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 57%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 88%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 74%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 69%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 38%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 59%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 32%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 72%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 89%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 72%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 88%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 88%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 76%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 80%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 90%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 69%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 71%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 86%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 88%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 95%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 74%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 63%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 78%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 50%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 66.7%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 50%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 71%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 94
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 48
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 47
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 82%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 7%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 69%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 64%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 40%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 58
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 86%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 73.2%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 24%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 93%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 87%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 12
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 71%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 65%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 58%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 0%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 87%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 92%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 69%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 83%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 25%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 50%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 89%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 87%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 95%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 74%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 89%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 74%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 25%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 85%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 81%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 96%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 89%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 87%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 53%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 73%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 64%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 60%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 48%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 90%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 57%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 53%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 60%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 67%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 79%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 49%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 72%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 51%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 84%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 81%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top