or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Bill McCollum

Bill McCollum's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Social

Full Name: Bill McCollum

Social

2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 93%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 93%
1999-2000 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 60%
1999-2000 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
1999 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
1999 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 66%
1999 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 40%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 58%
1999 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 42%
1999 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 27%
1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 27%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 54%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 54%
1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
1998 Bread for the World - Positions 67%
1998 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 63%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 38%
1998 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 27%
1998 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 27%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 87%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 87%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 33%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 33%
1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
1997-1998 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
1997 Bread for the World - Positions 33%
1997 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 44%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 89%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 89%
1997 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 30%
1997 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
1997 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 38%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 38%
1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
1996 Bread for the World - Positions on Addressing World Hunger 0%
1996 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 0%
1996 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 68%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 29%
1996 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1996 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 7%
1996 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 7%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 93%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 93%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
1995 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 50%
1993 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 70%
1991-1992 Christian Voice - Positions 93%
1991-1992 Christian Voice - Positions 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top