or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Alcee L. Hastings, Sr.

Alcee L. Hastings, Sr.'s Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Agriculture and Food

Full Name: Alcee L. Hastings, Sr.
Current Office: U.S. House - District 20, Democratic
First Elected: 11/03/1992
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 20
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary Aug. 26, 2014
Jay Bonner
(Running)
Republican
Jean Enright
(Potential)
Democratic
Jean Enright
(Potential)
Democratic
Jameel McCline
(Potential)
Democratic
Jameel McCline
(Potential)
Democratic

Agriculture and Food

2014 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 50%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 79%
2011 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 35%
2009-2010 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 50%
2009-2010 National Farmers Union - Positions 88%
2008 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 79%
2007-2008 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 83%
2007-2008 Grassroots Netroots Alliance - Positions 50%
2007-2008 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 100
2007 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 85%
2007 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 0%
2007 United Fresh Produce Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 29%
2005-2006 National Farmers Union - Positions 100%
2005 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 42%
2005 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 33%
2003-2004 National Farmers Union - Positions 100%
2002 Vote Hemp - Positions on Industrial Hemp Policy Fence Sitter
2001-2002 Minnesota Farm Bureau - Positions 43%
2001-2002 Minnesota Farm Bureau - Positions 38%
2001-2002 National Farmers Union - Positions 80%
2001 American Coalition for Ethanol - Positions 100%
2000 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 20%
1999-2000 National Farmers Union - Positions 92%
1998 National Farmers Union - Positions 88%
1997 National Farmers Union - Positions 100%
1996 National Farmers Union - Positions 85%
1995-1996 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 31%
1995 National Farmers Union - Positions 70%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Positions on Agriculture 0%
1994 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 83%
1993-1994 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 21%
1993 National Farmers Union - Positions 56%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top