Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Michael 'Mike' N. Castle's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

2010 Endorsements

Foreign Affairs

2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 70%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 39%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 25%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 25%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 50%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 20%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 10%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 80%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 58%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 41%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 31%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues C
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C-
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 40%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score F
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 83%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 11%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement B
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions +2
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C+
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 50%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 55%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 20%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 46%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 36%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 17%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 75%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 43%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 14%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 14%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur D
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 63%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 77%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 44%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 67%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 25%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 38%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 46%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 43%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 33%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 87.5%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -6
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 36%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 44%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 22%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 46%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 22%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 44%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 88%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -2
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 11%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 83%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 80%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 43%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 45%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 53%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 10%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 14%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 51%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 18%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 72%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 43%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 45%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 53%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 38%
1997-1998 PeacePAC - Positions 38%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 65%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 60%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 33%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 71%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 53%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 46%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 40%
1996 PeacePAC - Positions 50%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 33%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 8%
1993-1994 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top