Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Michael 'Mike' N. Castle's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 38%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 52%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 44%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 59%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 30%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 70%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 58%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 60%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 70%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 45%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 50%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 52%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 56%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 72%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 86
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 59%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 58%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 58%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 50%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 40%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 30%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 28%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 30%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 54.7%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 28%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 38%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 35
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 31%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 96
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 28%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 63%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 100
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 29%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 53.8%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 52%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 32%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 100
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 29%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 51%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 56%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 43%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 28%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 96
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 47%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 49%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 0%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 52%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 48%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 52%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 25%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 30%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 33%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 40%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 41%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 46%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 23%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 47%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 55%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 92%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 47%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 38%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 48%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 53%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 64%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 53%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 32%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 44%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 51%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 55%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 27%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 42%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 45%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 21%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 50%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 56%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 46%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 37%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 66%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 56%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 67%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top