or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Wayne A. Allard

Wayne A. Allard's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Social

Full Name: Wayne A. Allard

Social

2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 30
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 79%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 60%
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2007-2008 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 0%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 0%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Right Wing Index Score 75%
2007-2008 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2007 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 30%
2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 0
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 94%
2007 Family Research Council - Positions 100
2007 Family Research Council - Positions 100
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 30%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2007 National Employment Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 84%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 14%
2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 21
2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 21
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 100%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 59%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 80%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 80%
2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 66
2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 66
2006 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 11%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2006 Americans United for the Separation of Church and State - Positions 0%
2006 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 0%
2006 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 89%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 18%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 74%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 11%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 11%
2006 Secular Coalition for America - Positions 0%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2006 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 80%
2006 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 80%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 83%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 17%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 St. Joseph Health System - Positions 0%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2005 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 0%
2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2005 Mennonite Central Committee - Positions 0%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2005 National Association of Social Workers - Positions on Professional Advocacy 0
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
2005 National Criminal Justice Association - Positions 75%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 77%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 84%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 74%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 95%
2004 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2004 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 40%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 96%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 14%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 84%
2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0%
2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 85%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 100%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 100%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -6
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 9%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 40%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Center for Reclaiming America - Positions 100%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 33%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 0%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 59%
2003 National Network for Youth - Positions 0%
2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 40%
2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 40%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 88
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 88
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 88
2002 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 62%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0%
2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 0%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 83
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 83
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 83
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
2002 Vote Hemp - Positions on Industrial Hemp Policy Anti Hemp
2001-2002 American Bar Association - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 40%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -9
2001-2002 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
2001-2002 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 0%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2001 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 9%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 0%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
2001 National Youth Advocacy Coalition - Positions 0%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 93%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 89%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 89%
2000 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
2000 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
2000 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 30%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2000 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2000 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2000 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 0%
2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 90%
2000 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 9%
2000 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 9%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 80%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 78%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 78%
1999-2000 American Bar Association - Positions 0%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1999-2000 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 80%
1999-2000 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
1999 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
1999 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 13%
1999 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 90%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 93%
1999 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 6%
1999 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 9%
1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 9%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 74%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 74%
1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
1998 Bread for the World - Positions 67%
1998 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 22%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 0%
1998 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 27%
1998 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 27%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 0%
1997-1998 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 0%
1997 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
1997 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 36%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1997 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 40%
1997 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
1997 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 75%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 75%
1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
1996 Bread for the World - Positions on Addressing World Hunger 0%
1996 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 0%
1996 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
1996 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1996 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 13%
1996 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 13%
1995-2004 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 71%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 5%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 69%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 69%
1993 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 70%
1991-1992 Christian Voice - Positions 93%
1991-1992 Christian Voice - Positions 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top