Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Wayne A. Allard's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 91.3%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 63%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 94%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 29
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 94%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 30%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 92.5%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 93%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 80%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 29%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 21
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 89%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 92%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 86.2%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 10
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 91%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 94%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 96%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 100%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 70%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 72%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 76%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 85%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 89%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 78%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 83%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 84%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 74%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 75%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 75%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 69%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 94%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top