Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

David E. Skaggs's Ratings and Endorsements

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

1995-1996 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
1991-1992 National Gay & Lesbian Task Force - Positions 100%

Socially Conservative

1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
1997-1998 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 5%
1997-1998 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 5%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
1997 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 8%
1997 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 8%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 15%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 15%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 18%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 18%
1996 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
1996 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 31%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 31%
1995 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 30%
1995 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 30%
1993 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 10%
1993 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 10%
1991-1992 Christian Voice - Positions 7%
1991-1992 Christian Voice - Positions 7%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top