Representative Nancy Pelosi's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Nancy Pelosi
Current Office: U.S. House - District 12, Democratic
First Elected: 06/02/1987
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 12
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 3, 2014
Gender: Female
Family: Husband: Paul; 5 Children: Nancy Corinne, Christine, Jacqueline, Paul, Alexandra
Birth Date: 03/26/1940
Birth Place: Baltimore, MD
Home City: San Francisco, CA
Religion: Catholic
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Agriculture and Food

2014 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 50% 2014 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100% 2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 100% 2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 100% 2013 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 92% 2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 92% 2011-2012 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions (House) 12% 2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100% 2011 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 17% 2009-2010 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 25% 2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0% 2008 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 29% 2007-2008 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 83% 2007-2008 Grassroots Netroots Alliance - Positions 100% 2007-2008 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0% 2007-2008 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 100 2007-2008 The National Mining Association - Positions 33% 2007-2008 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 90% 2007 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 34% 2007 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 0% 2007 United Fresh Produce Association - Positions 0% 2005-2006 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 17% 2005-2006 National Farmers Union - Positions 100% 2005 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 28% 2005 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 33% 2003-2004 National Farmers Union - Positions 83% 2002 Vote Hemp - Positions on Industrial Hemp Policy Fence Sitter 2001-2002 National Farmers Union - Positions 90% 2001 American Coalition for Ethanol - Positions 0% 2001 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100% 2000 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 20% 1999-2000 National Farmers Union - Positions 83% 1998 National Farmers Union - Positions 100% 1997 National Farmers Union - Positions 83% 1997 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 92% 1996 National Farmers Union - Positions 87% 1996 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100% 1995-1996 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 25% 1995 National Farmers Union - Positions 80% 1995 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions on Workplace Rights 100% 1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Positions on Agriculture 100% 1994 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 78% 1994 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 88% 1993-1994 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 7% 1993 National Farmers Union - Positions 78% 1993 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions on Workplace Rights 88% 1991-1992 National Farmers Organization - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.