Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Don E. Young's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (AK) - At-Large, Republican

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 25%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 53%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 20%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 51%
2014 Conservative Review - Positions 44
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 32%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 56%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 56%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2013-2014 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 100
2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 50%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 75%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 42%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 76%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 59%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 52%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 43%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 56
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 76%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 71%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 51%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 52%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 57%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 69%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 44%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 53%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 94%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 38%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 76%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 61%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 72%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 56%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 100%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 76%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 76%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 76%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 66%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 62%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 57%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 76%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 89%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 63%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 64%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 76%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 44
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 74%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 60%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 53%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 44%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 71%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 57%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 63.3%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 56%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 67%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 87
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 76%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 22
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 56%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 65%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 63%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 13
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 73%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 8%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 64.2%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 50%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 43%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 85%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 73.7%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 41%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 81%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 69%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 83%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions -8
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 62%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 63%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 89%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 69%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 0%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 89%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 40%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 57%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 95%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 79%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 96%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 77%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 86%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 78%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 71%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 88%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 97%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 91%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 80%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 72%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 73%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 86%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 73%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 79%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 67%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 68%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 86%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 48%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 89%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 79%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 90%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 91%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 73%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 85%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top