or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Spencer T. Bachus

Representative Spencer T. Bachus's Special Interest Group Ratings

Spencer T. Bachus
Full Name: Spencer T. Bachus
Current Office: U.S. House - District 6, Republican
First Elected: 11/03/1992
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Budget, Spending and Taxes

2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 61%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 62%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 39%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 40%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 60%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 71%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 76%
2010 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 85%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 42%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 84%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 69%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 67%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 82%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 90%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 67%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 62%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 0%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 80%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 92%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 65%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 58%
2005 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 11%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2004 American Shareholders Association - Positions 90%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 62%
2004 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 38%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 64%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 84%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 63%
2003 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 35%
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 57%
2002 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 17%
2001-2002 Concord Coalition - Positions 50%
2001-2002 FreedomWorks - Positions 90%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 91%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2001 American Shareholders Association - Positions 100%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 67%
2001 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 23%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
2000 Concord Coalition - Positions 11%
2000 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 17%
1999-2000 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 67%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 65%
1999 Concord Coalition - Positions 10%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 54%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
1998 Concord Coalition - Positions 36%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 59%
1998 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 26%
1997-1998 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 92%
1997 Concord Coalition - Positions 60%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 57%
1997 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 31%
1996 Concord Coalition - Positions 40%
1995-1996 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 100%
1995 Concord Coalition - Positions 55%
1995 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 84%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Taxes Score 100%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Spending Score 76%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Total Score 82%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Budget Score 87%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Deregulation Score 83%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top