Joe Pitts's Special Interest Group Ratings

Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Government Operations

2016 FreedomWorks - Positions 84% 2015 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 83% 2014 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 93% 2014 FreedomWorks - Positions 81% 2013-2014 Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence - Brady Gun Violence Lap Dog Rating: Brady Rating 0% 2013 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 95% 2011 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 80% 2010 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91% 2009 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Scores 89% 2009 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 98% 2008 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 88% 2008 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 88% 2007 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 94% 2005-2006 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91% 2005 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91% 2005 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 5% 2004 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 90% 2003 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 92% 2003 State PIRGs Working Together - Positions 0% 2002 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 100% 2001 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 89% 2000 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 83% 1999 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 73% 1998 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 82% 1997 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 89%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.