Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Mark Pocan's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. House (WI) - District 2, Democratic

Environment

2015 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2015 Environment America - Positions 100%
2015 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2014 Environment America - Positions 100%
2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 95%
2014 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 97%
2013-2014 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 0%
2013-2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 95%
2013-2014 League of Conservation Voters - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 97%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 83%
2013 EarthRights International - Positions 63%
2013 Environment America - Positions 100%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 92%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 96%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 96%
2011-2012 Sierra Club - John Muir Chapter - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 93
2005-2006 Sierra Club - John Muir Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 100
2005-2006 Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Clean Wisconsin Action Fund - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Sierra Club - John Muir Chapter - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
1999-2000 Clean Wisconsin Action Fund - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top