or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Charles 'Charlie' A. Gonzalez

Charles 'Charlie' A. Gonzalez's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Liberal

Full Name: Charles 'Charlie' A. Gonzalez

Liberal

2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 65%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 65%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Social) 78%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 64%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Economic) 67%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Composite Score) 70%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 72%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 72%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 47%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 60%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 47%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 28%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 28%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 65%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 71%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 67%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 69%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 80%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 11
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 11
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 41%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 41%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 87%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 73%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 72%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 78%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2008 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 69%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 55%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 82%
2008 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2008 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 62%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 60%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 62%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 60%
2007-2008 Progressive Democrats of America - Positions 44%
2007-2008 Progressive Democrats of America - Positions 44%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 71%
2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 63%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 53%
2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 63
2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 63
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 72%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 63%
2006 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 68.8%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 70%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 90%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 90%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 50%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 50%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Economic Issues 13%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Social Issues 73%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 0%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 0%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2005 Hope for Peace and Justice - Positions 100
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 78%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 60%
2005 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 69%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 67%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 67%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 78%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 61%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 70%
2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Democrats for Life of America - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Radical Middle - Positions 10%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 78%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 70%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 62%
2003 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 71%
2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 84%
2002 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 82%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 77%
2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 75%
2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 75%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 88%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 88%
2001-2002 Radical Middle - Positions 30%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 83%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 70%
2000 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80%
2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 77%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 80%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 85%
2000 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 58%
2000 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 58%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
1999 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 80%
1999 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 79%
1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 73%
1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 73%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top