or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

[x] close
Print Track This Candidate

Charles 'Charlie' A. Gonzalez

Charles 'Charlie' A. Gonzalez's Special Interest Group Ratings

Charles 'Charlie' A. Gonzalez
Full Name: Charles 'Charlie' A. Gonzalez

Filter by Issue:

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2012 Open Doors USA - Positions 50%
2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 76%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 28%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 60%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 47%
2011 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (House Only) 80%
2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 88%
2009-2010 Arab American Institute - Positions 15%
2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 91%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 11
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 44%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 67%
2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 95%
2009 American Library Association - Positions 25%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 41%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 10%
2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 96%
2008 American Library Association - Positions 22%
2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 91%
2007-2008 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab American Issues 80%
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 85%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 60%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 62%
2007-2008 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions on Civil and Human 96
2007-2008 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions on Civil Rights and Social Justice Issues 98%
2007-2008 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Greek American Issues Score 45%
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 83
2007 American Library Association - Positions 30%
2007 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab American Issues 67%
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 93%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 100%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 96%
2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100
2006 Association of Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) - Positions 89%
2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 91%
2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 88%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 0%
2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 97%
2005 Arab American Institute - Positions 2%
2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 66%
2004 Arab American Institute - Positions 33%
2004 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 75%
2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 77%
2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 95%
2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 93%
2003 American Library Association - Positions 100%
2003 Arab American Institute - Positions 75%
2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 89%
2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 95%
2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 86%
2001-2002 Arab American Institute - Positions 57%
2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 83%
2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 78%
2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 87%
2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 73%
2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 71%
2000 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 86%
2000 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 100%
2000 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 87%
1999-2000 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 0%
1999-2000 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
1999-2000 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
1999 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 85%
1999 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 91%
1999 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 82%
1999 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions (106C_1) 91%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

About Project Vote Smart

Help Us If You Can

Media & Communications

Education

For Candidates

One Common Ground, Philipsburg, MT 59858 Hotline: 888-Vote-Smart (888-868-3762)
All content © 1992 - 2013 Project Vote Smart unless otherwise attributed - Privacy Policy - Legislative demographic data provided by Aristotle International, Inc. Mobile Version

Back to top