James 'Jim' W. DeMint's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: James 'Jim' W. DeMint
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Debbie; 4 Children
Birth Date: 09/02/1951
Birth Place: Greenville, SC
Home City: Greenville, SC
Religion: Presbyterian
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Women

2012 Federally Employed Women - Positions 20% 2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2011-2012 American Association of University Women - Positions 10 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 94% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91% 2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100% 2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 45% 2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 10% 2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2009 American Association of University Women - Positions 13% 2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 0% 2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2009 Women Employed - Positions 0% 2008 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 20 2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 0% 2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 0 2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 10% 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 10% 2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 33% 2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 30% 2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 9% 2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 17% 2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 0% 2005 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0% 2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2003-2004 American Association of University Women - Positions 0% 2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 23% 2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2003-2004 Federally Employed Women - Positions 0% 2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 3% 2003 American Association of University Women - Positions 0% 2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100% 2003 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 29% 2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2002 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 100% 2001-2002 American Association of University Women - Positions 0% 2001-2002 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 0% 2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93% 2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 5% 2001 American Association of University Women - Positions 0% 2001 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 0% 2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 1999-2000 American Association of University Women - Positions 0% 1999 American Association of University Women - Positions 0% 1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.