Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Debbie Wasserman Schultz's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: National Security

Office: U.S. House (FL) - District 23, Democratic

National Security

2014 Peace Action West - Positions (June 3, 2014) 65%
2013-2014 Center for Security Policy - Positions 15%
2013-2014 Council for a Livable World - Positions (House) 90%
2013-2014 National Association of Police Organizations - Positions 85%
2013-2014 National Iranian American Council - Positions 25%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 65%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Center for Security Policy - Positions 19%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 50%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 14%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Center for Security Policy - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 66%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 66%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2007-2008 Center for Security Policy - Positions 4%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 87%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 92%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 24%
2005-2006 Center for Security Policy - Positions 24%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 100%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top