Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. House (FL) - District 23, Democratic
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 10% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 5% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 8% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 5% 2014 Conservative Review - Positions 4 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 16% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 32% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 15% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013-2014 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 9 2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 24% 2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1% 2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 9% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 26% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 29% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 19% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 22% 2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 32 2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1% 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 0% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 15% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 15% 2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 18% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 11% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 3% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 14% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 15% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 16% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 10% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 37% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 22% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 63% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 0% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 0% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 0% 2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1% 2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 13% 2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 8% 2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0% 2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 10% 2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 4% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 3% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 0% 2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 4% 2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1% 2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0% 2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 4% 2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 14% 2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 9% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 5% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 0% 2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 10% 2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 30% 2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 25% 2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 14.7% 2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 11% 2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0% 2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 0 2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 9% 2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 11% 2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0% 2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 0% 2007 GOPUSA - Positions 0% 2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 22.7% 2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 27% 2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 13% 2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 4% 2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0% 2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 14% 2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 21.5% 2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 31% 2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 27% 2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 4% 2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 21% 2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 0% 2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 20% 2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 13% 2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 28% 2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 20% 2002 Christian Coalition of Florida - Positions 33% 2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 0% 1999 Christian Coalition of Florida - Positions 8% 1998 Christian Coalition of Florida - Positions 18%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.