Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Patrick 'Pat' J. Toomey's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Office: U.S. Senate (PA) - Jr, Republican

Foreign Affairs

2014 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 1%
2014 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2014 Peace Action West - Positions (June 3, 2014) 0%
2013 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 80%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 0%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 46%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 67%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 77%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 22%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 44%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 75%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 14%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 60%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 94%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 87.5%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 11%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 46%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 44%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 12%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 10%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 68%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -2
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 21%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 25%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 100%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 27%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 12%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 10%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 14%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 21%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 70%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 27%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top