or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Patrick 'Pat' J. Toomey

Senator Patrick 'Pat' J. Toomey's Special Interest Group Ratings

Patrick 'Pat' J. Toomey
Full Name: Patrick 'Pat' J. Toomey
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Jr, Republican
First Elected: 11/02/2010
Last Elected: 11/02/2010
Next Election: 2016

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 97%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 100%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 88%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 90%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 96%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 80%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 94%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 32%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 20%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 23%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 77%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 68%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 97%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 75%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 75%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 75%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Center for Reclaiming America - Positions 100%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 96%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 70%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 64%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 65%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 50%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2002 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 80%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 75%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 85%
2000 Liberty Lobby - Positions 33%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 85%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 59%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
1999 Liberty Lobby - Positions 70%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top