or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Heather A. Wilson

Heather A. Wilson's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: Heather A. Wilson

Foreign Affairs

2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues D
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C+
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 82%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 18%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C+
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 14%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 9%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 17%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 50%
2006 Church World Service - Positions 33
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C+
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 23%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 23%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 38%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 71%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 40%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 16%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6
2005 Church World Service - Positions 75
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B+
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 100%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 38%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 23%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 67%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 75%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -9
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 70%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 75%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 13%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 55%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 50%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2003 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 22%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 22%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 45%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 22%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 50%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 44%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 71%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -2
2001-2002 Bread for the World - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 83%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 80%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 21%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 21%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2000 Bread for the World - Positions 50%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 20%
2000 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 0%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 14%
1999 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 29%
1999 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 83%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 61%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 18%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 77%
1998 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 13%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 17%
1997-1998 PeacePAC - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top