Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Heather A. Wilson's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 74.3%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 82%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 49%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 76%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 49%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 27
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 58%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 7%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 68.3%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 40%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 67%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 29
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 57%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 51.7%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 29%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 70%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 67%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 4
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 62%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 51%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 50%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 91%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 55%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 50%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 14%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 80%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 82%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 85%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 62%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 59%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 73%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 64%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 76%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 79%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 47%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 62%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 61%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 83%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 46%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top