or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Heather A. Wilson

Heather A. Wilson's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Conservative

Full Name: Heather A. Wilson

Conservative

2008 FreedomWorks - Positions 68%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 82%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 74.3%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 70%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 71%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 59%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 49%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81%
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 76%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 76%
2007-2008 Family Research Council - Positions 76%
2007-2008 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 42%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 76%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 49%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 49%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 70%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 27
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 58%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 58%
2007 Family Research Council - Positions 75
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 40%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 7%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 7%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 7%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 56%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 63%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 68.3%
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score C-
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 57%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 57%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 61%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 61%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 10%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 40%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 40%
2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 25
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 67%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 73%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 29
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 57%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 57%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 71%
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 50%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 51.7%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 50%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 50%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 39%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 39%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 29%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 29%
2006 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 57%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 84%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 70%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 70%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 67%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 67%
2005-2006 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 78%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 64%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 81%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 81%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 79%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 4
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 62%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 62%
2005 Family Research Council - Positions 75%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 59%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 51%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 50%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 45%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 46%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 54%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 54%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 38%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 71%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 71%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 38%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 91%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 76%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 55%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 55%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 92%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 50%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 51%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 46%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 53%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 53%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 50%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 14%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 50%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 14%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 80%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 80%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 55%
2003-2004 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 82%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 70%
2003-2004 The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score 0%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 80%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 82%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 82%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 76%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 85%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 85%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 62%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 62%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 77%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 56%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 59%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 64%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 55%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2002 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 92%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 73%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 73%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 64%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 73%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 57%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 53%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 76%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 76%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 79%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 79%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2001-2002 FreedomWorks - Positions 85%
2001-2002 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 94%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 86%
2001-2002 The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score 0%
2001-2002 The Cato Institute - Trade Barrier Votes Score 82%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2001 Family Research Council - Positions on Conservative Issues 70%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 69%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 60%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 78%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 78%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2000 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2000 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2000 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 33%
2000 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 33%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 64%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 55%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 60%
2000 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 60%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 47%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 47%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 80%
1999-2000 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 85%
1999-2000 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 64%
1999-2000 The Cato Institute - Trade Barrier Votes Score 78%
1999-2000 The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score 0%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
1999 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 50%
1999 Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby) - Positions 50%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 61%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 54%
1999 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 84%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 51%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 83%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 67%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 43%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 46%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 46%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 86%
1997-1998 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top