Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Heather A. Wilson's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2008 Drum Major Institute - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 50
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 5%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 60%
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 0
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 35%
2007 Drum Major Institute - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 50
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 40%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 0%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 56%
2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 0
2007 PFLAG, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays - Positions 0%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 50%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2006 Drum Major Institute - Positions 0%
2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 48%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 24%
2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 50%
2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 53%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 35%
2005-2006 The Arc - Positions 67%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2005 Drum Major Institute - Positions 25%
2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 44%
2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 30%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 66%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 71%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Drum Major Institute - Positions 14%
2004 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 15%
2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 21%
2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 39%
2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 43%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2003 Drum Major Institute - Positions 50%
2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 11%
2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 35%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 13%
2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 25%
2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 17%
2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 33%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 6%
2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 0%
2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%
2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 18%
2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 29%
2000 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 36%
2000 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 40%
2000 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 47%
1999-2000 Common Cause - Lifetime Score 0%
1999-2000 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 30%
1999-2000 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 44%
1999 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 38%
1999 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 36%
1999 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 55%
1997-1998 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 50%
1997-1998 Campaign for a Color Blind America - Positions 75%
1997-1998 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 29%
1997-1998 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 22%
1997-1998 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 11%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top