or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

George Felix Allen

George Felix Allen's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Conservative

Full Name: George Felix Allen

Conservative

2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 86%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 86%
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 83%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 43%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 43%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 7
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 88%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 80%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 77%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 86%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 74%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 78%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 80%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 75%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 80%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 78%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 75%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2004 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 92%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 67%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 71%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 65%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 67%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 80%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 80%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 80%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 80%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 86%
2003-2004 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 90%
2003-2004 The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score 100%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 85%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 87%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 59%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 76%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 62%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 66%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 73%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 55%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 80
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 89%
2001-2002 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 85%
2001-2002 The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score 25%
2001-2002 The Cato Institute - Trade Barrier Votes Score 88%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 77%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 80%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 93%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 93%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 80%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top