or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Charles 'Charlie' F. Bass

Charles 'Charlie' F. Bass's Special Interest Group Ratings

Charles 'Charlie' F. Bass
Full Name: Charles 'Charlie' F. Bass

Foreign Affairs

2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 36%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 17%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 55%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 48%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 45%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 52%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 39%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 21%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 94%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 38%
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 38%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 31%
2004 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 69%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 29%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 67%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 13%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 36%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 22%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 11%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 88%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -3
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 21%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 13%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 18%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 0%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 29%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 36%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 27%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 24%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 38%
1997-1998 PeacePAC - Positions 25%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 25%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 0%
1996 PeacePAC - Positions 20%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 20%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top