Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Rodney P. Frelinghuysen's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: U.S. House (NJ) - District 11, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 11

Animals and Wildlife

2014 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 67%
2013 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 50%
2013 Animal Welfare Institute - Compassion Index 50%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 46%
2013 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 55%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2012 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 25%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 26%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 54%
2011-2012 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 45%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0%
2011 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 38%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 26%
2010 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score 100%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 17%
2009-2010 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 47%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 25%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 46%
2008 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 50
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 69%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 67%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 67
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 83
2006 National Animal Interest Alliance Trust - Positions 0%
2006 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 100%
2005-2006 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 88%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 56%
2005-2006 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 85
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 85%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 33%
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 83%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 67%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 67%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 67%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2004 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2004 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 67
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 67
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 45%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 67%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 67%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 67%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 67%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 47%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 67%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 50%
2003 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 67%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 67%
2002 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 100%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 100%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 60%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 100%
2001-2002 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100%
2001-2002 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 100%
2000 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 66%
2000 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 88
1999-2000 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 88%
1999 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 66%
1997 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 50%
1995-1996 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 66%
1995 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top