Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Rodney P. Frelinghuysen's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. House (NJ) - District 11, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 11

Environment

2014 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 25%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2013 Environment America - Positions 16%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 46%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 42%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 11%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 45%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 20%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2011-2012 Clean Water Action - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 26%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 22%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 54%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 21%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 57%
2011 Environment America - Positions 21%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 48%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 23%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 0
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 26%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 20%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 52%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 17%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 21%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 61
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 25%
2009 Environment America - Positions 47%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 21%
2008 Environment America - Positions 54%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 76
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 69%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 67%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 87
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 70%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 83
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 67%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 58%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 78%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 56%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 43%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 33%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 62
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 33%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 20%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 45%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 42%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 27%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 25%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 47%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 55%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 50%
2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 67%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 60%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 55%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 28%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50%
1999-2000 American Lands Alliance - Positions 50%
1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 63%
1999-2000 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 100%
1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 56%
1998 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 66%
1997 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
1995-1996 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top