Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Rodney P. Frelinghuysen's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (NJ) - District 11, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 11

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 71%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 60%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 58%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 71%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 42%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 35%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 40%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 76%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 43%
2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 40%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 65%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 54%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 84%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 52%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 50%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 54%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 35
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 72%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 66%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 59%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 57%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 53%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 53%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 69%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 55%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 44%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 61%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 65%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 38%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 33%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 38%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 55%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 56%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 63%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 56%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 66%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 77%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 66%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 64%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 90%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 85%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 63%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 70%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 80%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 64%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 81%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 61
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 86%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 72%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 80%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 55%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 30%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 60%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 68%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 46%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 90%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 52
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 45%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 76
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 46%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 56%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 90%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 87
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 41%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 7%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 57.7%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 83
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 29%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 61.5%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 79%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 69%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 62
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 53%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 64%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 0%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 67%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 54%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 66%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 38%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 25%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 67%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 68%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 69%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 54%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 65%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 58%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 25%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 73%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 56%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 96%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 66%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 59%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 87%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 56%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 57%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 62%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 37%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 48%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 48%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 73%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 32%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 52%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 67%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 80%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 50%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 52%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 59%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 34%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 60%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top