or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

John Eric Ensign

John Eric Ensign's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: John Eric Ensign

Foreign Affairs

2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 75%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 80%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 7%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 7%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 25%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 11%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues A+
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 25%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2008 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 33%
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 17%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement D
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -2
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D-
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 21%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur D
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Positions on Iraq War Amendments 50%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 36%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 33%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 33%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur F
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 92%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 22%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 13%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 33%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -7
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 14%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 62%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 35%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 0%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 40%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 79%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -9
2001-2002 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 50%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 23%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 7%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 29%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 0%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 78%
1997 Bread for the World - Positions 50%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 25%
1996 Bread for the World - Positions on Addressing World Hunger 33%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 57%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 50%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 48%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 0%
1996 PeacePAC - Positions 40%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 33%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top