Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Thomas 'Tom' Allen Coburn's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Health and Health Care

Office: U.S. Senate (OK) - Jr, Republican

Health and Health Care

2014 Alzheimer's Impact Movement - Positions 0%
2014 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2014 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (June 4, 2014) 100%
2014 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions (June 27, 2014) 0%
2014 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions captured January 9, 2014 (reflect past 6 years' voting record) 0%
2013-2014 National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions 0%
2013 American Public Health Association - Positions 25%
2013 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 0%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 25%
2013 National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) 100%
2013 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions captured February, 2013 (reflect voting records of past 6 years) 0%
2012 AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Advocacy Association - Positions 25%
2012 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions captured June, 2012 (reflect voting records of past 6 years) 0%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 33%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2011 AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Advocacy Association - Positions 0%
2011 American Nurses Association - Positions 0%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2011 Association of University Centers on Disabilities - Positions 0%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2010 American Public Health Association - Positions 0%
2010 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Alzheimer's Impact Movement - Positions 33%
2009-2010 American Hospital Association - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2009-2010 St. Joseph Health System - Positions 0%
2009 AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Advocacy Association - Positions on AIDS Drug Assistance 5%
2009 American Nurses Association - Positions 0%
2009 American Public Health Association - Positions 0%
2009 American Society for Radiation Oncology - Positions 0%
2009 Association of University Centers on Disabilities - Positions 0%
2009 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 0%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2009 The Children's Health Fund - Positions 0%
2008 Academy of General Dentistry - Positions 0%
2008 American Public Health Association - Positions 20%
2008 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 0%
2008 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 0%
2007-2008 AIDS United - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Hospital Association - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Association for Addiction Professionals (formerly National Association of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselors) - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - Positions 0%
2007-2008 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2007-2008 St. Joseph Health System - Positions 33
2007-2008 The American Geriatrics Society - Elderly Health Advocacy Score F
2007 Alliance For Headache Disorders Advocacy - Positions 100%
2007 American Academy of Family Physicians - Positions 0%
2007 American Public Health Association - Positions 14%
2007 Association of University Centers on Disabilities - Positions 0%
2007 Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance - Positions 100
2007 League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score 0%
2007 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 0%
2006 American Public Health Association - Positions 40%
2006 National Association of Social Workers - Positions on Professional Advocacy 20
2006 Parkinsons Action Network - Positions 0%
2006 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Academy of Emergency Medicine - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Hospital Association - Positions 17%
2005-2006 American Nurses Association - Positions 20%
2005-2006 National Association for Addiction Professionals (formerly National Association of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselors) - Positions 0%
2005-2006 National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions 0%
2005-2006 National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - Positions 0%
2005-2006 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
2005-2006 St. Joseph Health System - Positions 0%
2005 American Public Health Association - Positions 30%
1999 American Public Health Association - Positions 14%
1999 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1999 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 0%
1998 American Public Health Association - Positions 0%
1997-1998 AIDS United - Positions 7%
1997-1998 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1997 American Public Health Association - Positions 0%
1997 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100%
1996 National Association of Social Workers - Positions 10%
1996 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 89%
1995-1998 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 0%
1995-1996 AIDS United - Positions 13%
1995-1996 Smokefree Action - Positions 42%
1995 American Public Health Association - Positions 13%
1993-1996 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top