or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Marshall 'Mark' Clement Sanford, Jr.

Marshall 'Mark' Clement Sanford, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Liberal

Full Name: Marshall 'Mark' Clement Sanford, Jr.
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Republican
First Elected: 05/07/2013
Last Elected: 05/07/2013
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 1
General Nov. 4, 2014

Liberal

2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 21%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 15%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 21%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 10%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 16%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 10%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 16%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 15%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy 26%
2013 National Journal - Liberal (Composite) 44%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 52%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
1999 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 39%
1999 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 0%
1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 64%
1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 64%
1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 34%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 29%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 43%
1998 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 47%
1998 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 47%
1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 10%
1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 10%
1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
1997 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 3%
1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
1996 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 41%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 30%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 45%
1996 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 33%
1996 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 33%
1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 10%
1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 10%
1995 The Libertarian Party - Positions 20%
1995 The Libertarian Party - Positions 45%
1995 The Libertarian Party - Positions 70%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top