or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Roger F. Wicker

Roger F. Wicker's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: Roger F. Wicker
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Jr, Republican
First Elected: 12/31/2007
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2018

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 82%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 80%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 67%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 75%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 46%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 52%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 40%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 87%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 60%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 50%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 65%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 70%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 68%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 60
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 64%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 89%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Composite Score) 74%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 77%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 60%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 82%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 77%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 94%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 65%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 90%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 72%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 66%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 32%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 50%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 50%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 50%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 91%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 87%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 100%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 92%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 77%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 100%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 83%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 91%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 40
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 92%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 77%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 71%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 60%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 70%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 65%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 78.7%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 71%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 47%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 75%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 100
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 36
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 47%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 90%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 7
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 81%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 19%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 64%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 81.8%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 60%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 88.5%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 83%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 30%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 0
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 88%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 94%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 0%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 87%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 71%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 76%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 40%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 13%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 77%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 80%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 93%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 90%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 85%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 87%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 58%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 84%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 73%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 62%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 53%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 47%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 100%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 72%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 94%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 49%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 80%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

2012 Endorsements

Back to top