Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Frank A. LoBiondo's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Marriage, Family, and Children

Office: U.S. House (NJ) - District 2, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 2
Bill Hughes, Jr.
(Running)
Democratic
Bayode Olabisi
(Running)
Independent
Costantino Rozzo
(Running)
American Labor
Alexander Spano
(Running)
D-R Party
Gary Stein
(Running)
Independent

Marriage, Family, and Children

2014 FRC Action - Positions 75%
2014 Population Connection - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 0%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92%
2013-2014 CitizenLink - Positions (House Only) 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 57%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2013 Population Connection - Positions (Sept. 2013) 0%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 69%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 80%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 90%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 87%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 81%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 68%
2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 0%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 60%
2007-2008 American Family Association - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 81
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Family Research Council - Positions 76%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007 American Academy of Family Physicians - Positions 100%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 76%
2007 Family Research Council - Positions 75
2007 League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score 100%
2007 PFLAG, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays - Positions 100%
2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 25%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 43%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 85%
2006 Population Connection - Positions 29%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 93%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2005 Family Research Council - Positions 85%
2005 Population Connection - Positions 17%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 92%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 83%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2003-2004 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 31%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Population Connection - Positions 14%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 92%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 69%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 92%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 Population Connection - Positions 20%
2002 American Family Voices - Positions 17%
2002 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 75%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 80%
2002 Population Connection - Positions 56%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 87%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 80%
2001-2002 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 75%
2001 Family Research Council - Positions on Conservative Issues 80%
2001 Population Connection - Positions 60%
2000 Family Research Council - Positions 100%
2000 Population Connection - Positions 9%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 80%
1999-2000 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 60%
1999-2000 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 57%
1999 Population Connection - Positions 0%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 60%
1997-1998 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 60%
1997-1998 Population Connection - Positions 0%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 89%
1997 Population Connection - Positions 0%
1996 Population Connection - Positions 20%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top