or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Frank A. LoBiondo

Frank A. LoBiondo's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Full Name: Frank A. LoBiondo
Current Office: U.S. House - District 2, Republican
First Elected: 11/08/1994
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 2
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 3, 2014
Bill Hughes, Jr.
(Running)
Democratic
Bayode Olabisi
(Running)
Independent
Costantino Rozzo
(Running)
American Labor
Alexander Spano
(Running)
D-R Party
Gary Stein
(Running)
Independent

Environment

2014 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 75%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2013 Environment America - Positions 16%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 62%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 25%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 63%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 67%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 40%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 86%
2011-2012 Clean Water Action - Positions 25%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 33%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 79%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 47%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 57%
2011 Environment America - Positions 57%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 54%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 71%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 75%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 0
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 73%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 71%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 63%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 103
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 103
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009 Environment America - Positions 80%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 79%
2008 Environment America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 96
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 96
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 94%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
2007-2008 The National Mining Association - Positions 16%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 93
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 93
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 90%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 90%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 29%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 100
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 100
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 83%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 50%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 41%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 78%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 80%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 31%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 96
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 96
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 78%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 60%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 82%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 81%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 84%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 32%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 100%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 80%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 85%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 75%
2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 67%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 60%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 77%
2001-2002 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 28%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 100%
1999-2000 American Lands Alliance - Positions 100%
1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 57%
1999-2000 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 87%
1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 44%
1998 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 69%
1997 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 69%
1995-1996 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 69%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top