Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Michael 'Mike' Doyle's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. House (PA) - District 14, Democratic

Environment

2014 Environment America - Positions 86%
2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 94%
2014 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 73%
2013-2014 Clean Water Action - Positions 85%
2013-2014 League of Conservation Voters - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 86%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 83%
2013 Environment America - Positions 91%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 92%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 71%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 82%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 77%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 70%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 93%
2011-2012 Clean Water Action - Positions 83%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 88%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 84%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 71%
2011 Environment America - Positions 90%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 69%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 91%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 100%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL - Positions (House Only) 100
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 65%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 92%
2009-2010 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 83%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009 Environment America - Positions 100%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 93%
2009 PennEnvironment - Positions 100%
2008 Environment America - Positions 92%
2007-2009 PennEnvironment - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 88%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 85%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 90%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 80%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 14%
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 41%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 78%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 66%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 80%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 12%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 67%
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 61%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 90%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 74%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL - Positions 82%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 88%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 87%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 70%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 63%
2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 33%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 40%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 68%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL - Positions 64%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50%
1999-2000 American Lands Alliance - Positions 25%
1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 53%
1999-2000 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 87%
1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 56%
1998 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 41%
1997 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 44%
1995-1996 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 42%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top